Stability & Justice
Rankings
Global performance index based on stability & justice assessment metrics across 167 nations.
Denmark
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Switzerland
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Estonia
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
New Zealand
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Australia
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Finland
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Luxembourg
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Norway
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Sweden
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Germany
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Ireland
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Iceland
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Taiwan
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Belgium
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Netherlands
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Austria
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Canada
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
United Kingdom
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Japan
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
South Korea
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Latvia
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
United States
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Uruguay
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
France
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Lithuania
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Singapore
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Spain
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Chile
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Cyprus
Highly resilient foundations with strong rule of law and steadfast judicial independence.
Costa Rica
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Israel
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Malta
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Portugal
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Slovenia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Seychelles
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Italy
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Poland
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Slovakia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Greece
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Croatia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Jamaica
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Cape Verde
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Trinidad and Tobago
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Barbados
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Bhutan
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Montenegro
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Mauritius
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
South Africa
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Bulgaria
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Georgia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Romania
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Brazil
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Botswana
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Colombia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Panama
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Vanuatu
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Armenia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Dominican Republic
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Fiji
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Moldova
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
North Macedonia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Mongolia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Malaysia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Suriname
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Hong Kong
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Peru
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Albania
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Argentina
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Hungary
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Nepal
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Solomon Islands
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
São Tomé and Príncipe
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
United Arab Emirates
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Benin
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Ghana
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Kenya
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Sri Lanka
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Serbia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Guatemala
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Guyana
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Jordan
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Paraguay
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Bahrain
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Indonesia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Lesotho
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Qatar
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Senegal
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Tanzania
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Ecuador
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Honduras
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Maldives
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Oman
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Philippines
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Thailand
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
India
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Mexico
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Rwanda
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Tunisia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Kosovo
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Kazakhstan
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Malawi
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Kyrgyzstan
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Kuwait
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Morocco
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Papua New Guinea
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Saudi Arabia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Sierra Leone
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Togo
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Ukraine
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Zambia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Azerbaijan
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Bolivia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Gabon
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Nigeria
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Turkey
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Burkina Faso
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Niger
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Angola
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
China
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
El Salvador
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Uganda
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Madagascar
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Mali
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Mozambique
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Pakistan
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Liberia
Moderate institutional resilience; the judicial branch may be vulnerable to occasional interference.
Djibouti
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Algeria
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Ethiopia
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Comoros
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Egypt
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Laos
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Bangladesh
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Republic of the Congo
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Guinea-Bissau
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Cambodia
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Lebanon
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Mauritania
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Russia
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Eswatini
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Uzbekistan
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Belarus
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Cameroon
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Guinea
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Zimbabwe
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Burundi
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Haiti
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Tajikistan
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Iran
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Iraq
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Nicaragua
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Sudan
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Central African Republic
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Cuba
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Chad
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Libya
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Yemen
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Syria
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Venezuela
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Somalia
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Equatorial Guinea
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Turkmenistan
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Afghanistan
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
Eritrea
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
South Sudan
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.
North Korea
Critical institutional failure risk; judicial independence and general rule of law are highly compromised.