Advocacy & Expression
Rankings
Global performance index based on advocacy & expression assessment metrics across 167 nations.
Switzerland
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Denmark
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Ireland
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Norway
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Estonia
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Luxembourg
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Sweden
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Belgium
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Finland
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
New Zealand
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Australia
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Canada
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Germany
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
France
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Iceland
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Netherlands
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Portugal
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Costa Rica
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
United Kingdom
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Latvia
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Austria
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Spain
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Japan
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Lithuania
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
United States
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Chile
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Italy
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Trinidad and Tobago
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Taiwan
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Uruguay
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Jamaica
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Cyprus
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
South Korea
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Malta
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Slovakia
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Barbados
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Cape Verde
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Vanuatu
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Greece
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Seychelles
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Slovenia
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Suriname
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
South Africa
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Croatia
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Israel
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Brazil
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Poland
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Mauritius
Excellent environment for civil advocacy, backed by robust media liberties and freedom of expression.
Dominican Republic
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Panama
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Solomon Islands
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Argentina
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Botswana
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Colombia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Ghana
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Montenegro
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
São Tomé and Príncipe
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Bulgaria
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Peru
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Romania
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Lesotho
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Senegal
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Moldova
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Nepal
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Kosovo
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Armenia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Sri Lanka
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Ecuador
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Mongolia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Bhutan
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Guatemala
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
North Macedonia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Bolivia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Guyana
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Kenya
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Liberia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Maldives
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Malawi
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Paraguay
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Albania
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Fiji
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Benin
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Georgia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Honduras
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Malaysia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Papua New Guinea
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Sierra Leone
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Indonesia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Zambia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Hungary
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Nigeria
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Mexico
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Singapore
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Tunisia
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Tanzania
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Philippines
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
India
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Lebanon
Possible to advocate, but activists may encounter soft censorship or media control resistance.
Serbia
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Thailand
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Ukraine
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Madagascar
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Togo
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Gabon
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Jordan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Kyrgyzstan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Comoros
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Iraq
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Morocco
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Mozambique
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Mauritania
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Niger
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Angola
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Hong Kong
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Kazakhstan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Pakistan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Guinea-Bissau
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Mali
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
El Salvador
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Uganda
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Djibouti
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Ethiopia
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Turkey
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Burkina Faso
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Algeria
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Kuwait
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Zimbabwe
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Bangladesh
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Central African Republic
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Cameroon
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Republic of the Congo
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Guinea
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Haiti
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Oman
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Rwanda
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Chad
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Libya
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Azerbaijan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Burundi
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Bahrain
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Egypt
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Cambodia
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Qatar
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Russia
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Somalia
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Uzbekistan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Venezuela
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
United Arab Emirates
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Sudan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Nicaragua
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Tajikistan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Saudi Arabia
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Eswatini
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Yemen
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Belarus
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Iran
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Laos
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
South Sudan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Afghanistan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
China
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Equatorial Guinea
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Syria
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Cuba
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Turkmenistan
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
Eritrea
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.
North Korea
Highly dangerous environment for advocacy; severe systemic censorship and strict communication controls in place.